We are a market maker whose job is turnover. Exchanges and token projects engage us to grow trading volume on specific pairs. Every programme is written in numbers: monthly turnover, a cap on cost per $10k traded, share of tape, depth for the liquidity score. Then we report against those numbers every month.
Most market-making offers are vague on purpose. Ours is a short list of quantities, agreed per pair before we start, that your own trade data can verify at any time.
Three starting points, sized the way exchange tier programmes are written. The actual numbers are set per pair once we have seen your tape.
| Programme | Typical use | Monthly turnover | Pairs | Cost cap | Uptime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramp-up | New pair or new venue, first months, tier qualification | 100M per month | 1 to 2 | Agreed per pair | 98% |
| Core programme | Established pairs, designated market making, tier maintenance | 300M+ per month | 2 to 4 | Agreed per pair | 99% |
| Scale | Flagship pairs and perpetuals where volume is the product | 1B+ per month | 4+ | Agreed per pair | 99.5% |
Turnover scales with size, levels, the number of pairs and the depth of the venue’s own tape; we size each programme to the market.
Volume without a cost cap is just a bill. Our objective is explicit: maximise filled turnover subject to a hard limit on cost per $10k traded, funded by the venue’s maker rebate. Inventory is pulled back to flat, so the volume is real two-sided trading, not a position that has to be unwound.
Spot and perpetuals, on your venue, with a standard adapter for new integrations.
Bootstrap turnover from the first day of trading so early users see a market that moves, not an empty book.
Ongoing two-sided trading under your market-maker tier terms, with the volume and liquidity-score KPIs your programme already tracks.
USDT-margined and coin-margined perpetuals as well as spot, with funding and margin handled by our risk system.
We never go straight to size. Every programme follows the same staged path we use for our own capital.
Pairs, monthly targets, fee tier, collateral and reporting agreed in writing.
Your live market data, simulated fills, until connectivity and risk behave for at least five trading days.
Reduced size while the real fill rate on your venue is measured, so the ramp is planned on data rather than promised.
Size, levels and pairs stepped up month by month to the agreed turnover, cost cap re-checked at each step.
The same metrics we use internally, computed from your venue’s data so they can be checked.
Exchange-funded programmes on a maker fee tier, with collateral and leverage provided by the venue; project-funded programmes on a retainer or token loan; and hybrids with a share of rebates. We commit to volume and liquidity metrics, never to price outcomes.
Send the venue, the pairs and the monthly turnover you have in mind. We will come back with a sized programme, a ramp plan and a reporting sample.